Thursday, March 17, 2016

Google's plans for new Mountain View building include removal of 100 "heritage" trees

Google's plans for new Mountain View building include removal of 100 "heritage" trees

 
Updated 2:02 pm, Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Google has a vision for a sparkling new, glass-filled building in Mountain View, but that project will mean the removal of prized California trees.
The latest set of plans for the site - known as Charleston East - includes a proposal to cut down 160 trees to create space for a 595,000-square-foot complex. One hundred of those are identified as "heritage" due to their size and type, according to a city breakdown of the project. Some of the trees are redwoods.
Autoplay: On | Off
Catherine Martineau, executive director of the Palo Alto nonprofit Canopy, said any time a tree is cut down, it's a loss to the environment, but she added that these trees aren't worth a fight.
"I think it's important to say, 'Yes, we're going to lose something and it'll take time for new trees to mature," said Martineau, whose nonprofit aims to educate the community on the importance of urban trees. "But redwoods are definitely not a species of tree that belong in that area. They require a lot of water." 
She added that a lot of the redwoods in this area are stressed — if not dead — and thinks this is either because they haven't been receiving enough water in the drought years or they're being fed high-salinity recycled water.  
The project plan reports that an arborist found 23 percent of the trees at the site in declining health or dead. 
The Charleston East site, which neighbors the Googleplex at 2000 North Shoreline Blvd., currently consists of an open field surrounded by bands of trees. Google's plan is to cut down some of those trees in phases, build the new two-level building and surround it with bike and walking paths, community spaces and landscaping using native trees and plants. The plans include corridors of oaks mixed with manzanita, sage, coffeeberry and native grasses to benefit birds and insects. A savannah grassland will provide a habitat for burrowing owls and willow and cottonwood thickets will support migratory birds. Googlers will be invited to pull fruit from an orchard. 
Senior Mountain View City planner Stephanie Williams told NBC Bay Areathat the replacement landscaping "far exceeds" the trees Google is cutting down. 
"The landscaping they're proposing looks thoughtful and mimics native habitat and uses native plants," Martineau concurred. 
But while experts agree that Google is presenting an environmentally friendly plan, a few locals have shared their frustration in the past around the city giving companies permission to cut down heritage trees.
"Do not allow City Council to green-light all applications to cut down heritage trees for every construction project put before them," one survey-taker wrote in a 2014 questionnaire regarding Mountain View's "Master Tree Plan." I have been to council meetings. In one of the meetings, City Council approved the removal of 16 Heritage Trees over the course of one evening."
"Do not permit land developers and companies like Google to circumvent the heritage tree ordinances," wrote another.
Matrineau recognizes this loss but thinks the long-term benefits will be worth it. "There is an immediate loss," she said. "It would be insulting to those who want to retain the trees to not say that. But the landscape will be better in the long run."
Google originally submitted an application to the City of Mountain View for the Charleston East project in May 2015 and an updated version of the plans last month. The City of Mountain View will invite the public to comment on the latest plans in a study session on March 29.

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Ronald and Nancy Reagan Ignored the AIDS Crisis and You Know It, Hillary Clinton

Ronald and Nancy Reagan Ignored the AIDS Crisis and You Know It, Hillary Clinton

Mic 
In an interview with MSNBC Friday, 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said that Ronald and Nancy Reagan helped start a national conversation about HIV/AIDS. This is not exactly a bald-faced lie, but it is a gross misunderstanding of history and a misrepresentation of the true governmental neglect during the AIDS epidemic that killed millions worldwide. 
Here is her statement: 
People on Facebook and Twitter jumped at the gross inaccuracy right away. 
At 4:24 p.m. Eastern on Friday, Clinton issued this statement on her comments: "While the Reagans were strong advocates for stem cell research and finding a cure for Alzheimer's disease, I misspoke about their record on HIV and AIDS. For that, I'm sorry."
Here's some backstory on Reagan and the AIDS epidemic: The very first appearance of AIDS in the media happened in 1981 in the New York Times in an article called "Rare Cancer Seen in 41 Homosexuals." In a now-infamous press conference in October 1982, Reagan's deputy press secretary Larry Speakes laughed when he received the first public question about the AIDS epidemic — and what followed was what many people might call the "plague years" of the AIDS epidemic. 
"What's AIDS?" Speakes asked when the journalist, Lester Kinsolving, asked about government response to the epidemic. 
"It's known as the 'gay plague,'" Kinsolving replied. 
The room laughs and Speakes cracks jokes about whether anyone in the room has it. 
Source: YouTube
Reagan first spoke publicly about AIDS in 1985, after a reporter asked him about AIDS research at a press conferenceBy the time Reagan finally made a major speech about AIDS to the public in 1987, HIV had killed more than 20,000 people nationwide. Today, an estimated 36.9 millionpeople worldwide live with HIV and 1.2 million of those people live in the United States. HIV is a disease that affects society's most marginalized — people of color, the gay and trans communities and people living in poverty.
It is wholly incorrect to say that the Reagans started a "national conversation" about HIV/AIDS, especially when there is clear indication that is incorrect. What we do have is poster after poster, many made by AIDS activist groups, showing just how much they felt Reagan was at fault for much of the silence around the AIDS epidemic.
View photo
.
Ronald and Nancy Reagan Ignored the AIDS Crisis and You Know It, Hillary Clinton
Source: Jerry Cleveland/Getty Images
Here's the truth about the national conversation about HIV/AIDS: Activists forced a reluctant government to discuss the epidemic.
Here's the truth about the national conversation about HIV/AIDS: Activists forced a reluctant government to discuss the epidemic.
Groups like the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power — a group that at its height included thousands of members, many of them living with AIDS — deserve the credit for starting a national conversation about HIV.
Source: YouTube
"They did nothing to start the national conversation," Jennifer Avril, a member of ACT UP, toldMic. "Activists in Denver, California and New York started the conversation and never stopped, even while Reagan's policies and inaction allowed the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans."
Avril said Clinton needs to learn her "HIV 101" before making any further comments. "I'm disappointed in her," she said.
Alysia Abbott, who took care of her father before his eventual death from an AIDS-related illness in 1992 and wrote about it in the memoir Fairyland, also had a much different recollection of events surrounding the HIV/AIDS conversation. 
"The Reagans did precisely nothing to start a national conversation about AIDS," Abbott toldMic. "They did everything to avoid it."
"One day we we'll look back on those years as a moral low point in this country, a time when those in power turned their backs on the most vulnerable in society ... because these people with HIV and AIDS were other, 'not us,' and somehow not deserving of concern and mobilization." 
With the recent death of Nancy Reagan and the public disclosure of Charlie Sheen's HIV-positive status, HIV awareness is seemingly higher than ever. Apparently, the real history of the disease is not.

Thursday, March 10, 2016

8 Yr Old Boy Teaches White Interviewer About His Pineal Gland (Third-Eye)!



8 Yr Old Boy Teaches White Interviewer About His Pineal Gland (Third-Eye)!


0
31366
I can’t lie, when I viewed this video, I smirked because I know the black god still exist. To see an 8yr old explain what the pineal gland is and the use of it is remarkable. This is what we need to teach our black children. We need to teach them if they truly want to see, they must close both their eyes and use their third eye.
In order to teach our children about the third eye, we would have to teach them about our ancestors. When we teach them about our ancestors, we teach them about self. When you have knowledge of self, you will never be fit to be a slave to anyone. You understand you are a supreme being. Having knowledge of self allows you to know as long as your believe in yourself, there is nothing that can stop you. Kudos to whoever is parenting this young boy.
http://urbanintellectuals.com/2016/01/17/8-yr-old-boy-teaches-white-interviewer-pineal-gland-third-eye/

Death of a Shale Man: The Final Days of Aubrey McClendon

Business

Death of a Shale Man: The Final Days of Aubrey McClendon

david_wethe,Bloomberg 19 hours ago